parkways

I don’t quite get this post by Atrios. He says he’s often skeptical of urban parks, which is understandable (depending on the park), but to judge by the link he provides, the places he’s talking about aren’t really parks. I’ve never seen Boston’s Rose Kennedy Greenway, but the picture here in the Boston Globe is not a picture of anything I’d call a park. It looks like a median strip in the middle of a wide and busy road – a street that might be called a “way”, perhaps, with some “green” in the middle.

Incidentally, unless other sections of the Greenway have wider “parklands”, I doubt the solutions proposed in that Globe article will do anything for the “park” even though they would probably benefit the neighborhood. But that pictured section is probably never going to be better than something to look at while driving by.

Advertisements

2 Responses to parkways

  1. teofilo says:

    I’ve been there. It’s okay, and more substantial than a landscaped median, but yeah, not really a “park” in the traditional sense.

  2. andrew says:

    Ah, so the picture really is a bit deceptive. It seems like a problem of conflating “green space” with “park.”

%d bloggers like this: